Original Article
Author Details :
Volume : 3, Issue : 4, Year : 2019
Article Page : 13-18
https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jco.2019.034
Abstract
Introduction: There has been a long discussion in orthodontics about the sliding and loop mechanics as the preferred method of retraction of anterior teeth in maxillary first premolar extraction cases. But no study has compared sliding and loop mechanics with indirect anchorage for enmasse retraction.this study aims to compare sliding and loop mechanics with indirect anchorage while doing enmasse retraction of anterior six maxillary teeth.
Materials and Methods: 11 patients were treated with sliding and loop mechanics each and enmasse retraction was done after maxillary first premolar extraction and using indirect anchorage with the help of miniscrews.
Results: Sliding mechanics is found to be better than loop mechanics in anterior retraction and reducing proclination with faster space closure. Loop mechanics was found to be better in torque control and preventing bite deepening during retraction.
Conclusion: Both mechanics have their own advantages and disadvantages and hence should be used as per the requirement of individual cases.
Keywords: - Sliding, loop, friction, frictionless, indirect anchorage, retraction.
How to cite : Singhal C , Goyal V, Singh G, Izhar A, Singh R, Gupta N, To Evaluate and Compare the Rate of Space Closure and Incisor Retraction between Sliding Mechanics and CNA Mushroom Loop Archwire Using Indirect Anchorage. J Contemp Orthod 2019;3(4):13-18
This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, which allows others to remix, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
Received : 11-11-2019
Accepted : 19-12-2019
Viewed: 620
PDF Downloaded: 99