Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics

Official Publication of Indian Orthodontic Society


Durga Prasad, Raja Sigamani, Bhaskar, Kumaran, Yashaswini, and Rohith: Prevalence of malocclusion in school going children of age 12-15 years in Telangana


Introduction

Health is the functional or metabolic regulation of a living body. In humans, health is an individual capability to conform and adjust to the challenges like socially, mental or physically.1

Health systems of the human body connects with oral health. Mouth is the window to health of our body. Most of the nutritional deficiencies, systemic diseases, infections etc are manifested first as oral conditions. Malocclusion is the highest public health problem in the world because of its high prevalence. It is one of the most common oral health problem after dental caries2 and periodontal diseases and it is ranked 3rd among worldwide public health diseases. The WHO included malocclusion as handicapping dentofacial anomaly because it causes disfigurement or it impedes function.3 Since malocclusion has major affect on patients facial aesthetics, social and psychological consequences and bring the cause of stress for patient and their families.4 Therefore, it is important to find out the prevalence of malocclusion and proper treatment to correct them. One of the major problems in studying malocclusion is the availability of suitable method for recording the occurrence and severity of orthodontic problem thus orthodontic indices are used in epidemiological studies on malocclusion. Though malocclusion is a common oral health problem its diagnosis is dependent on classification of malocclusion. A standard system of classification for malocclusion is required for planning and evaluating the orthodontic services.5 One of the methods is by using orthodontic indices. An index has defined as a numerical value describing the relative status of a population on a graduated scale with definite upper and lower limits.6

The results of the epidemiological studies in India on malocclusion not only helps in planning orthodontic treatment but also helps in rational approach for determining the etiological factors of malocclusion.7 Telangana – Suma S et al.8 in his study compared the prevalence and severity of malocclusion between rural and urban children in nalgonda district. They observed that the malocclusion was more in urban (20.8%) than in rural areas (14.9%) and more in females (21.8%) than males (13.2%) the reason was socio-economical variation and dietary habits. G Anita et al.9 conducted a study on school students in Telangana state, they observed 10% requires elective treatment, 3% suggesting highly desirable treatment and 0.9% indicating mandatory treatment, 86.1% suggesting no treatment. Venugopal reddy et al.10 has done a study on schoolgoing children of Khammam district of age group 10-12 years. He observed that 65.9% with class I malocclusion, 9.25% has class II malocclusion and 1.37% has class III malocclusion, 15.4% has increased overjet, 0.2% has reverse overjet, 43.6% has increased overbite, 2% have Openbite, 14.01% had cross bite, 46.23% has midline diastema and 2.98% had rotated tooth.

Materials and Methods

Figure 1

Flow chart of the methodology

https://typeset-prod-media-server.s3.amazonaws.com/article_uploads/4a1ad761-99bf-4be5-b4bf-4208d42bd274/image/d4aa916c-95ca-4a33-90d5-5e743fa80314-u00000.jpg

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion criteria

  1. All students with chronological age group of 12-15 years

  2. Students who had all permanent teeth erupted

  3. Students native of Telangana and both the parents are of Telangana state origin without interstate marriages

  4. Students,whose parents gave consent and children assenting to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

  1. Students with any previous history of Interceptive (or) Orthodontic treatment or on going orthodontic treatment

  2. Medically compromised students

  3. Un co-operative students

  4. Any physical limitations who cannot open the mouth

  5. Students with extracted, missing permanent teeth, impactions and delayed eruption of permanent teeth.

  6. Students with no major (or) local systemic problems and any trauma to facial structures

The basic method for the recording of malocclusion that has been jointly developed by WHO/FDI Index has been used. In this study all the districts of Telangana State has been included. The examination of the students were carried out in the medical hall of the school premisis under bright day light. All the instruments used for the study are sterilized and taken to the school on the day of examination. Data were coded and entered into excel sheet. At the end of the survey, the data were scrutinized again and was handed over to the Statistician.

Results

Table 1

Frequency distribution of study sample

Type

Frequency

Percent

Class I (Normal)

2288

24.7

Class I (malocclusion)

5338

57.6

Class II

1386

14.9

Class III

263

2.8

Total

9275

100

Table 2

Comparison among gender in Class I

Parameter

Female

Male

Chi sq

P value

N

%

N

%

Crowding

1438

59.7

1420

48.5

67.291

<0.001**

Spacing

364

15.1

346

11.8

12.538

<0.001**

Diastemma

248

10.3

242

8.3

6.595

0.010*

Overbite

1442

59.3

1420

48.4

70.361

<0.001**

Overjet

1438.0

59.7

1420

48.4

65.711

<0.001**

Openbite

196

8.1

210

7.2

1.778

0.182 NS

Crossbite

112

4.7

114

3.9

1.213

0.211 NS

Midline shift

620

25.7

598

20.4

21.385

<0.001**

[i] **-Highly significant (p<0.001), *-Significant (p<0.05), NS- Not significant (p>0.05)

Table 3

Comparison among gender in Class II

Parameter

Female

Male

Chi sq

P value

N

%

N

%

Crowding

223

34.5

100

13.5

84.59

<0.001**

Spacing

32

4.9

42

5.7

0.371

0.542 NS

Diastemma

14

2.2

20

2.7

0.424

0.515 NS

Overbite

626

96.8

691

93.5

7.7

0.006*

Overjet

626

96.8

718

97.2

0.192

0.662 NS

Openbite

21

3.2

6

.8

10.698

0.001*

Crossbite

2

0.7

40

5.7

37.92

<0.001**

Midline shift

70

10.8

44

6.0

10.817

0.001*

[i] **-Highly significant (p<0.001), *-Significant (p<0.05), NS- Not significant (p>0.05)

Table 4

Comparison among gender in Class III

Parameter

Female

Male

Chi sq

P value

N

%

N

%

Crowding

56

41.5

38

29.7

3.979

0.046*

Spacing

0

0.0

5

3.9

5.376

0.020*

Diastemma

2

1.5

0

0.0

1.911

0.167 NS

Overbite

0

0.0

0

0.0

-

-

Overjet

96

71.1

100

78.1

1.702

0.192 NS

Openbite

24

17.8

34

26.6

3.196

0.074 NS

Crossbite

28

20.7

36

28.1

1.946

0.163 NS

Midline shift

0

0.0

0

0.0

-

-

[i] NS — Not significant (p>0.05), *-Significant (p<0.05)

The frequency distribution of the collected study sample according to the groups, In total 9275 subjects, 2288 (24.7%) were with Class I molar relationship and without any dental positive findings. 5338 (57.6%) were with Class I malocclusion, 1386 (14.9%) were with class II malocclusion and 263 (2.8%) were with Class III malocclusion (Table 1).

Discussion

Epidemiological study of disease is the first step in public health endeavours. In India as mentioned in the introduction section there is wide variation in prevalence of malocclusion11 which can be attributed to lack of uniformity in collection of data, variability of methods, indices used to access the severity of malocclusion. The prevalence of malocclusion is found to vary with different population, race, origin and ethnicity.12

The overall prevalence of malocclusion of 12 to 15 years old children was found to be 89% in agreement with previous studies.13 Children at this age are permanent dentition which represents their health status. With age children grow and interact with various environments; they begin to develop differential self-concepts that are specific to different areas of life. This process begins in early childhood and accelerates during the higher primary and high school years. Self-concept represents a learned, organised response pattern that incorporates the reactions of other people; the positive and negative experiences of the child and the Childs ability to achieve his/her goals and objectives.14

It has shown that children begin to understand the ill health effects on social activities around eight years of age along with the enormous psychosocial changes associated with childhood.15 The time of middle adolescence represents when social relationships may be particularly important increasing from early adolescence and levelling off in late adolescence16, 17 Malocclusions with commonly occurring forms in adolescents are often presumed to be at the risk for negative self-esteem and social maladjustment. 18 Bullying is another social impact commonly attributed to malocclusion.19

With this background the present study was designed to assess the prevalence of malocclusion and need for orthodontic treatment in 12-15 years old Telangana school children, selecting three types of schools viz government, private, private aided schools with boys and girls. Many epidemiological studies have done previously among different populations, age groups, ethnic regions & minor communities to evaluate the prevalence of malocclusion, but there is evidence of limited documentation on newly divided regions of India after 2014 like Telangana state. Being a resident researcher of that region, this study has focused on the population of Telangana state.

One of the major hindrances to get uniform data related to prevalence of malocclusion in India is because of variable ethnic, linguistic, communal nativities. So, it is very difficult to screen the whole population of entire country to interpret the results for application. Moreover, selecting a specific population to access the prevalence is also difficult as variations are observed among the same set of population. Hence, we incorporated 9219 school children of 12-15 years age group residing in Telangana region. The primary objective of the assessment is to determine the prevalence of malocclusion & dental anomalies to estimate the treatment needs of a population as a basis for planning of orthodontic services. Recording malocclusion is important for document purpose which serves as data for planning orthodontic service to the community. Among various types of quantitative methods,16 WHO/FDI basic method is one such tool which provides a common morphology basis for studies of prevalence of malocclusion in various parts of the world as well as for studies into methods for assessing the need and demand for treatment of malocclusion. Table 1

The prevalence of Class I malocclusion with positive dental finding is found to be higher (57.6%) compared to Class II and Class III malocclusion. This can be attributed in accordance with study done by Sandhu S. S, 2012 as Class I malocclusion is the most prevalent malocclusion in India followed by Class II and Class III. The prevalence of Class II malocclusion (14.9%) is found to be higher than the average Class II malocclusion ion other parts of southern India where it is around (5%) [Sadhu S. S]. The prevalence of Class III malocclusion (2.8%) is also different from regions of India like 1.4% in Rajasthan 2.3% in Bangalore 3.4% in Delhi [Das U. M]. These finding are different from Caucasians (0.8%) and Chinese (4%) population.

Gender comparison in class I malocclusion

Among the male subject’s overjet, overbite and crowding were found to be higher, whereas in female subjects’ overbite is found to be higher in our study.

Gender comparison in class II malocclusion

Among the male subject’s overjet is found to be higher and in female subjects both overjet and overbite are found to be higher in our study.

Gender comparison in class III malocclusion

Among both male and female subjects’ overjet is found to be higher in the study.

There is no evidence for segregated comparison among male and female subjects in class I, II & III malocclusions using WHO/FDI tool in Indian population to contradict the results of the present study.

Conclusion

Observations recorded from our study as follows:

This study gives a baseline data of the prevalence and severity of malocclusion in 12-15 years of school children in Telangana state.

Outcome of this study is useful to the community

  1. Dental professionals

  2. NGO’S

  3. Further research

Whereas, the limitations are,

  1. It’s only observational study and no intervention is done

  2. Sample size is limited to apply for the whole population of Telangana

  3. Subjects included are native of Telangana state origin only; other children of different states are not included in the study.

Source of Funding

None.

Conflict of Interest

None.

References

1 

M Huber A Knottnerus L Green How should we define health?BMJ20113431310.1136/bmj.d4163

2 

H Prakash V P Mathur National oral health care programIndian Pediatr200239111722

3 

WHO Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference1946100

4 

B L Todor Ioana Scrobota Environmental factors associated with malocclusion in children population from Mining areas, western RomaniaInt J Environ Res public Health20191211610.3390/ijerph16183383

5 

B Thilender L Pena C Infante S S Parada C De Mayorga Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescent in Bogota, Columbia. An epidemiological survey related to different stages of dental developmentEur J Orthod20012321536710.1093/ejo/23.2.153

6 

A Gupta Dr Rabindra Man Shrestha A review of orthodontic IndicesOrthod J Napal201442445010.3126/ojn.v4i2.13898

7 

R Hassan Rahimah AK Occlusion, malocclusion and method of measurements. An overview. Arch Orofac Sci2007239

8 

S Suma C Shekar B R Manjunath Assessment of malocclusion status in relation to area of residence among 15 year old school children using Dental Aesthetic IndexInt J Dent Clin201132147

9 

G Anita Dental Aesthetic Index of school students in Telangana region- an epidemiological studyJ Int Oral Health2013565560

10 

N Reddy The prevalence of malocclusion among 10-12 years old school children in khammam District, Telangana: An Epidemiological studyInt J Pedod Rehabil201942657010.4103/ijpr.ijpr_5_19

11 

A Singh B Singh O P Kharhancda D K Shukla K Goswami Malocclusion and its traits in rural school children from HaryanaJ India Orthod Soc1998317680

12 

R S Corruccini R H Potter A A Dahlberg Changing occlusal variation in Pima AmerindsAm J Physical Anthropol198362331741

13 

F S M Danaei P Amirrad Orthodontic needs of 12-15 year old students in shiraz, Islamic republic of IranEastern Mediterr Health J200713232634

14 

Graber: Incidence and recognition of malocclusion. Graber’s textbook of Orthodontics2009155200

15 

P H Brook W C Shaw The development of an index for Orthodontic treatment priorityEur J Orthod19891133092010.1093/oxfordjournals.ejo.a035999

16 

A Gupta Dr Rabindra Man Shrestha. A Review of Orthodontic IndicesOrthod J Nepal2014424450

17 

V T J Bezroukov Basic method of recording occlusal traitsBull world Health Orig197957695561

18 

G Lombardo F Vena P Negri S Pagano C Barilotti Worldwide prevalence of malocclusion in different stages of dentition: A systematic review and meta-analysisEur J Paediatr Dent20202121152210.23804/ejpd.2020.21.02.05

19 

E M Boeck Prevalence of malocclusion in children between 5 and 12 years-old in municipal schools inAraraquara Rev CEFAC201315518



jats-html.xsl


This is an Open Access (OA) journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International, which allows others to remix, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.

  • Article highlights
  • Article tables
  • Article images

Article History

Received : 14-03-2022

Accepted : 22-03-2022


View Article

PDF File   Full Text Article


Downlaod

PDF File   XML File   ePub File


Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

Article DOI

https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jco.2022.004


Article Metrics






Article Access statistics

Viewed: 818

PDF Downloaded: 467