- Visibility 163 Views
- Downloads 101 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI doi: 10.18231/j.jco.8133.1758356136
-
CrossMark
Role of third molars in anterior crowding: Delusion or vindication?
- Author Details:
-
Abha Chansoria *
-
Yogesh Gupta
-
Varunjeet Chaudhary
-
Kratika Mishra
Abha Chansoria *
Aim: The aim of this study was to perceive the viewpoint of orthodontists with respect to role of third molars in crowding of anterior teeth in both upper and lower arches, whether they are in favour of prophylactic removal of third molars or not, the position of third molars most commonly responsible for crowding in the anterior teeth region and the variation of opinion among orthodontists with respect to years of experience.
Materials Required: Online questionnaire (Google documents), Offline questionnaire, Microsoft excel.
Method: Orthodontists in India registered with the Indian Orthodontic Society were sent an online questionnaire via social media applications and email. The questionnaire included questions based on their opinion on role of third molars in crowding of teeth in the anterior segment in context with which arch would more likely be affected, whether they support prophylactic removal of third molars, which position of impacted third molar is most commonly responsible and whether the years of experience of the orthodontist affects their viewpoint. The results were evaluated and on the basis of it an opinion of the orthodontists in India, registered with the Indian Orthodontic Society was established.
Results: According to the data received, the orthodontists believe that maxillary third molars are not responsible for crowding in maxillary anterior teeth but their opinion differed when considering mandibular third molars. A majority of 68.9% of the respondents favoured the fact that mandibular third molars are responsible for crowding of mandibular anterior teeth. They also supported that mandibular third molars should be extracted to prevent crowding in mandibular anterior region but prophylactic removal of third molars were acceptable only in 48.5% of the interviewed orthodontists. A significant difference was noted with respect to age of experience. The younger dentists proposed to prophylactically extract the third molars whereas the senior dentists did not accept this theory.
Conclusion:The aim of this study was perceive the viewpoint of orthodontists with respect to role of third molars in crowding of anterior teeth in both upper and lower arches, whether they are in favour of prophylactic removal of third molars or not, the position of third molars most commonly responsible for crowding in the anterior teeth region and the variation of opinion among orthodontists with respect to years of experience.
References
- Martin Dewey. The third molars in relation to malocclusion. Int J Orthod. 1917;3:529–33. DOI:10.1016/S1072-3471(17)90221-4
[Google Scholar] - Broadbent BH. Ontogenic development of occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1941;11:223–41.DOI:10.1043/0003
[Google Scholar] 3219(1941)011<0223:ODOO>2.0.CO;2 - Broadbent BH. The influence of the third molars on the alignment of the teeth. Am J Orthod Oral Surg. 1943; 29(6): 312–30. DOI:10.1016/S0096-6347(43)90384-9
[Google Scholar] - Vego L. A longitudinal study of mandibular arch perimeter. Angle Orthod. 1962; 32:187 –92. DOI:10.1043/0003-
[Google Scholar] 3219(1962)032<0187:ALSOMA>2.0.CO;2 - Woodside D. Round table: extra oral force. J Clin Orthod. 1970;14(10):554–5. DOI:10.2478/aoj-2004-0005
[Google Scholar] - Bishara SE, Andreasen G. Third molars: a review. Am J Orthod. 1983;83(2):131–7. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9416(83)90298-1
[Google Scholar] - Ades AG, Joondeph DR, Little RM, Chapko MK. A longterm study of the relationship of third molars to changes in the mandibular dental arch. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990; 97(4):323–35. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(90)70105-L
[Google Scholar] - Southard TE, Southard KA, Weeda LW. Mesial force from unerupted third molars. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;99(3):220–5. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70004-G
[Google Scholar] - Kruger E, Thomson WM, Konthasinghe P. Third molar outcomes from age 18 to 26: findings from a population-based New Zealand longitudinal study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001;92(2):150–5. DOI: 10.1067/moe.2001.115461
[Google Scholar] - Lindauer SJ, Laskin DM, Tüfek.i E, Taylor RS, Cushing BJ, Best AM. Orthodontists' and surgeons' opinions on the role of third molars as a cause of dental crowding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007;132(1):43–8. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.07.026
[Google Scholar] - Gökçe G, Akan B, Veli I. The role of impacted third molar angulation on the anterior crowding. APOS Trends Orthod. 2021;11(1):56–61. DOI:10.25259/APOS_158_2020
[Google Scholar] 494 Chansoria et al. / Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics 2025;9(4):488–494 - Zawawi KH, Melis M. The role of mandibular third molars on lower anterior teeth crowding and relapse after orthodontic treatment: a systematic review. Sci World J. 2014;2014:615429. DOI: 10.1155/2014/615429
[Google Scholar] - Garrocho-Rangel A, Pozos-Guillén A, Noyola-Frías MÁ. Prophylactic Extraction of Third Molars: Evidence-Based Dentistry. Odovtos-Int J Dent Sc. 2017;19(3):10–5. DOI:10.15517/ijds.v0i0.29101
[Google Scholar] - Gavazzi M, De Angelis D, Blasi S, Pesce P, Lanteri V. Third molars and dental crowding: different opinions of orthodontists and oral surgeons among Italian practitioners. Prog Orthod. 2014;15(1):60. DOI: 10.1186/s40510-014-0060-y
[Google Scholar]