A novel indicator for assessing sagittal dysplasia: CAP1 angle

References

1. Riedel RA. The relation of maxillary structures to cranium in malocclusion and in normal occlusion. Angle Orthod. 1952;22(3):142–5.
2. Jacobson A. The ‘Wits’ appraisal of jaw disharmony. Am J Orthod. 1975;67(2):125–38. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(75)90065-2
   [Google Scholar]
3. Binder RE. The geometry of cephalometrics. J Clin Orthod. 1979;13(4):258–63.
4. Enlow DH. A morphogenetic analysis of facial growth. Am J Orthod. 1966;52(4):283–99. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(66)90169-2
   [Google Scholar]
5. Nanda RS. The rates of growth of several facial components measured from serial cephalometric roentgenograms. Am J Orthod. 1955;41(9):658–73. DOI:10.1016/0002-9416(55)90112-3
   [Google Scholar]
6. Moore AW. Observations on facial growth and its clinical significance. Am J Orthod. 1959;45(6):399–423. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9416(59)80002-6
   [Google Scholar]
7. Baik CY, Ververidou M. A new approach of assessing sagittal discrepancies: the beta angle. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 2004;126(1):100–5. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.08.026
   [Google Scholar]
8. Arvysts MG. Nonextraction treatment of severe class II division 2 malocclusion: part 1. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1990;97(6):510–21. DOI: 10.1016/S0889-5406(05)80032-0
   [Google Scholar]
9. Nanda R. Biomechanics and esthetic strategies in clinical orthodontics. St Louis, MO: Elsevier; 2005, pp. 38–73.
10. Adenwalla ST, Kronman JH, Attarzadeh F. Porion and condyle as cephalometric landmarks: an error study. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1988;94(5):411–5. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90130-8
    [Google Scholar]
11. Moore RN, DuBois LM, Boice PA, Igel KA. The accuracy of measuring condylion location. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop. 1989;95:344–347. DOI: 10.1016/0889-5406(88)90130-8
    [Google Scholar]
12. Neela PK, Mascarenhas R, Husain A. A new sagittal dysplasia indicator: the Yen angle. World J Orthod. 2009;10(2):147–51.
13. Bhad W, Nayak S, Doshi U. A new approach of assessing sagittal dysplasia: the W angle. Eur J Orthod. 2011:35(1):1–5. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjr001
    [Google Scholar]
14. Bjork A. Facial growth in man, studied with the aid of metallic implants. Acta Odont Scan . 1955;13(1):9–34. DOI: 10.3109/00016355509028170
    [Google Scholar]
15. Bjork A. Cranial base development: a follow-up x-ray study of the individual variation in growth occurring between the ages of 12 and 20 years and its relation to cranial base and face development. Am J Orthod. 1955;41(3):198–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-
    [Google Scholar] 9416(55)90005-1
16. Nelson TO. Analysis of facial growth utilizing elements of the cranial base as registrations. Am J Orthod. 1960;46:379.
17. Melsen B, Melsen F. The postnatal development of the palatomaxillary region studied on human autopsy material. Am J Orthod. 1982;82(4):329–42. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(82)90467-5
    [Google Scholar]
18. Arat ZM, Türkkahraman H, English JD. Longitudinal growth changes of the cranial base from puberty to adulthood. A comparison of different superimposition methods. Angle Orthod. 2010;80(4):537–44. DOI: 10.2319/080709-447.1
    [Google Scholar]
19. Nanda RS, Merrill RM. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal relationship between maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1994;105(4):328–44. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-
    [Google Scholar] 5406(94)70127-x
20. Braun S, Kittleson R, Kim K. The G-Axis: a growth vector for the mandible. Angle Orthod. 2004;74(3):328–31. DOI: 10.1043/0003-
    [Google Scholar] 3219(2004)074<0328:TGAGVF>2.0.CO;2
21. Shetty SK, Desai SJ, Kumar M, Madhur VK, Alphonsa BM, Cephalometric assessment of anteroposterior discrepancy: A review of different analyses in chronological order. Dent Press J Orthod. 2018;23 75–81. DOI: 10.36347/sjds.2019.v06i03.005
    [Google Scholar]
22. Björk A, Skieller V. Normal and abnormal growth of the mandible. A synthesis of longitudinal cephalometric implant studies over a period of 25 years. Eur J Orthod. 1983;5(1):1–46. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/5.1.1
    [Google Scholar]