- Visibility 102 Views
- Downloads 60 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI doi: 10.18231/j.jco.8381.1759468553
-
CrossMark
Effects of powered tooth brush on four different esthetically coated nickel titanium archwires -An in vitro study
- Author Details:
-
Shamna PK
-
Panchami Marish
-
Jithesh Kumar
-
Steve Mathew Jacob
-
Aravind Haridas Pillai
Panchami Marish
Jithesh Kumar
Steve Mathew Jacob
Aravind Haridas Pillai
Aim: To investigate the colour, gloss, and surface roughness of Epoxy-coated, Rhodium-coated, Ceramic-coated, and Teflon-coated NiTi arch wires before and after brushing in a simulated oral environment.
Materials and Methods: The sample group were categorized in to 4 groups based on different coatings. Group.1-Epoxy resin coated, Group.2- Rhodium coated, Group.3-Ceramic coated, Group.4-Teflon coated arch wires of 10 numbers each using sample size calculating formula for means and Baseline characteristics of arch wire i.e., gloss, colour and surface roughness were evaluated. Metallic brackets with .022” x .028” slot was bonded to the acrylic teeth portion of typhodont model and arch wires were ligated to the bracket assembly. Then the acrylic teeth portion of the typhodont along with the bracket-arch wire assembly was immersed in to the container with artificial saliva. 2 minutes of brushing was done twice daily with Colgate powered electrical toothbrush and Colgate tooth paste for 30 days and after that the arch wires were removed from the typhodont model and post brushing characteristics were evaluated. Gloss of the arch wires was measured by glossmeter. Spectrophotometer was used to determine the colour. Surface roughness was evaluated using scanning electron microscopy.
Results: The study revealed statistically significant differences between the groups (p < 0.05). Teflon-coated archwires exhibited the highest color stability, while Ceramic-coated archwires showed the least. Teflon-coated archwires also demonstrated the least loss of gloss, whereas Rhodium-coated archwires exhibited the highest gloss loss. In terms of surface roughness, Rhodium-coated archwires had the least roughness, with Ceramic-coated archwires displaying the highest roughness
Conclusion: Teflon-coated archwires performed the best in terms of color stability and gloss retention, while Rhodium-coated archwires exhibited minimal surface roughness after brushing
References
- Russell JS. Current Products and Practice: Aesthetic Orthodontic Brackets. J Orthod . 2005;32(2):146 -63. DOI: 10.1179/146531205225021024
[Google Scholar] - Kaur S, Singh R, Soni S, Garg V, Kaur M. Esthetic orthodontic appliances-A review. Ann Geriat Educ Med Sci. 2018;5(1):11-4. DOI:10.18231/2348-7240.2018.0003
[Google Scholar] - Kusy RP. A review of contemporary archwires: their properties and characteristics. Angle Orthod. 1997;67(3):197-207. DOI: 10.1043/0003-3219(1997)067
[Google Scholar]<0197:AROCAT>2.3.CO;2 - Durgo K, Orešić S, Rinčić Mlinarić M, Fiket Ž, Jurešić GČ. Toxicity of Metal Ions Released from a Fixed Orthodontic Appliance to Gastrointestinal Tract Cell Lines. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(12):9940. DOI: 10.3390/ijms24129940
[Google Scholar] - Akın M, Ileri Z, Aksakall S, Basxciftci FA. Mechanical properties of different aesthetic archwires. Turk J Orthod. 2014;27:85-9. DOI:10.13076/TJO-D-14-00006
[Google Scholar] - Khanloghi M, Sheikhzadeh S, Khafri S, Mirzaie M. Effect of Different Forms of Fluoride Application on Surface Roughness of Rhodium-Coated NiTi Orthodontic Wires: A Clinical Trial. Front Dent. 2023;20. DOI: 10.18502/fid.v20i13.12660
[Google Scholar] - Xu JL, Lai T, Luo JM. Preparation and characterization of the aesthetic coating on nickeltitanium orthodontic archwire by electrophoretic deposition. Progress in Organic Coatings. 2019;137:105271.
- Iijima M, Muguruma T, Brantley W. Effect of coating on properties of esthetic orthodontic nickel-titanium wires. Angle Orthod. 2012;82:319-25. DOI: 10.2319/021511-112.1
[Google Scholar] - Abbas AA, Alhuwaizi AF. The effect of wire dimension, type and thickness of coating layer on friction of coated stainless-steel arch wires. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2018;7(3):115– 21.
- Bradley TG, Berzins DW, Valeri N, Pruszynski J, Eliades T, Katsaros C. An investigation into the mechanical and esthetic properties of new generation coated nickel-titanium wires in the as- received state and after clinical use. Eur J Orthod. 2013. doi:
- 1093/ejo/cjt048.
- Muguruma T, Iijima M, Yuasa T, Kawaguchi K, Mizoguchi I. Characterization of the coatings covering esthetic orthodontic archwires and their influence on the bending and frictional properties. Angle Orthod. 2017;87(4):610-7. DOI: 10.2319/022416-
[Google Scholar] - 1
- da Silva DL, Mattos CT, Sima˜o RA, de Oliveira Ruellas AC. Coating stability and surface characteristics of esthetic orthodontic coated archwires. Angle Orthod. 2013;83(6):994-1001. DOI: 10.2319/111112-866.1
[Google Scholar] - Abdulkader YC, Kamaruddin AF, Mydin RB. Effects of salivary pH on coating durability of two different aesthetic archwire coatings under a simulated intraoral environment. Saudi Dent J. 2020;32(6):306-13. DOI: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2019.09.010
[Google Scholar] - Copello FM, Nojima LI, Souza MM, Pithon MM, Ruellas AC, Castro AC. Et al. The influence of cigarette smoke on colour stability and friction property of aesthetic orthodontic wires—In vitro study. Int Orthod. 2020;18(3):555- 60. DOI: 10.1016/j.ortho.2020.05.005
[Google Scholar] - Garcia-Godoy F, de Jager M. Effect of manual and powered toothbrushes on orthodontic bracket bond strength. Am J Dent. 2007;20(2):90-2.
- Yaacob M, Worthington HV, Deacon SA, Deery C, Walmsley AD, Robinson PG. et al. Powered versus manual toothbrushing for oral health. Cochrane Datab Syst Rev. 2014:(6): CD002281. Doi:
- 1002/14651858.CD002281.pub3.
- Neumann P, Bourauel C, Jäger A. Corrosion and permanent fracture resistance of coated and conventional orthodontic wires. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2002;13(2):141-7. DOI:10.1023/A:1013831011241
[Google Scholar] - Wichelhaus A, Geserick A, Hibst R, Sander FG. The effect of surface treatment and clinicaluse on friction in NiTi orthodontic wires. Dent Mater. 2005;21(10):938–45. DOI: 10.1016/j.dental.2004.11.011
[Google Scholar] - Rongo R, Valletta R, Bucci R, Rivieccio V, Galeotti A, Michelotti A. et al. In vitro biocompatibility of nickel-titanium esthetic orthodontic archwires. Angle Orthod. 2016;86(5):789-95. DOI: 10.2319/100415-663.1
[Google Scholar] - Filho HL, Maia LH, Araujo MV, Elias CN, Ruellas AC. Colour stability of aesthetic brackets: Ceramic and plastic. Aust Orthod J. 2013;29(1):13-20.
- Kula B, Yılmaz B, Karaaslan E. Changes in Color Stability and Surface Roughness of Teflon-Coated Arch Wires After Clinical Use. Turk J Orthod . 2022;3 5(4):260-7. DOI: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.20008
[Google Scholar] - Sehovic E, Ioannidis A, Hämmerle CH, Özcan M, Mühlemann S. Effect of tooth brush abrasion on the color, gloss and surface roughness of internally and externally stained monolithic Ceramic materials. J Prosthod Res. 2022;66(2):303-11.