- Visibility 120 Views
- Downloads 70 Downloads
- Permissions
- DOI doi:10.18231/j.jco.6442.1758974289
-
CrossMark
- Citation
Management of Class II division 2 patient treated with Carriere motion appliance
- Author Details:
-
Ekta Yadav *
-
Sumit Kumar
-
Mukesh Kumar
-
Charu Garg
-
Aditi Sharma
Class II division 2 malocclusion is often challenging to treat, and orthodontists usually find it difficult to make the correct treatment decision. Distalization is one of the treatment modalities. Recently, Luis Carriere presented the Carriere Motion appliance to overcome the unwanted side effect of anchor loss and non- compliance by the patient. Also, based on the severity of the malocclusion, there may be an overlapping of the retroclined central incisors by the lateral incisors or retroclined central and lateral incisors by the canines which leads to compromised micro esthetics. Successful management of such cases need special attention towards the micro esthetics of the patient.
References
- Baccetti T, Franchi L, McNamara Jr JA, Tollaro I. Early dentofacial features of Class II malocclusion: a longitudinal study from the deciduous through the mixed dentition. Am J Orthod. 1997;111(5):502-9. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(97)70287-7
[Google Scholar] - Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod. 1972;62(3):296-309. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9416(72)90268-0
[Google Scholar] - Kerosuo H, Hausen H, Laine T, Shaw WC. The influence of incisal malocclusion on the social attractiveness of young adults in Finland. Eur J Orthod. 1995;17(6):505-12. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/17.6.505
[Google Scholar] - Canut JA, Arias S. A long-term evaluation of treated Class II division 2 malocclusions: a retrospective study model analysis. Eur J Orthod. 1999;21(4):377-86. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/21.4.377
[Google Scholar] - Mc Namara Jr JA. Components of Class II malocclusion in children 8–10 years of age. The Angle Orthod. 1981;51(3):177-202. DOI:
- 1043/0003-3219(1981)051<0177:COCIMI>2.0.CO;2
- Keles A, Sayinsu K. A new approach in maxillary molar distalization: intraoral bodily molar distalizer. Am J Orthod. 2000;117(1):39-48. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(00)70246-0
[Google Scholar] - Papadopoulos MA. Clinical efficacy of the noncompliance appliances used for Class II orthodontic correction. Orthodontic Treatment of the Class II Noncompliant Patient: Current Principles and Techniques. 2006:367.
- Carrière L. A new Class II distalizer. J Clin Orthod. 2004;38(4):224-
- DOI:10.1016/B978-0-7234-3391-0.50032-X
[Google Scholar] - Attia KH, Aboulfotouh MH, Fouda AS. Threedimensional computed tomography evaluation of airway changes after treatment with Carriere Motion 3D Class II appliance. J Dent Maxillofacial Res. 2019;2(1):16-9. DOI:10.30881/jdsomr.00023
[Google Scholar] - Proffit WR, Fields HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary Orthodontics. 5th edition. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, Mosby; 2012.
- Hulsey CM. An esthetic evaluation of lip-teeth relationships present in the smile. Am J Orthod. 1970;57(2):132-44. DOI: 10.1016/0002-
[Google Scholar] 9416(70)90260-5 - Sharma PK, Sharma P. Dental smile esthetics: the assessment and creation of the ideal smile, Semin Orthod. 2012;18(3):193–201. DOI:10.1053/j.sodo.2012.04.004
[Google Scholar] - Uribe F, Nanda R. Treatment of Class II, Division 2 malocclusion in adults: biomechanical considerations. J Clin Orthod. 2003;37(11):599-606.
- de Carlos Villafranca F. Distalizer treatment of an adult Class II, division 2 malocclusion. J Clin Orthod: 2006; 40(9):561-5.
- Cangialosi TJ, Melstrell Jr ME, Leung MA, Ko JY. A cephalometric appraisal of edgewise Class II nonextraction treatment with extraoral force. Am J Orthod. 1988;93(4):315-24. DOI:
- 1016/0889-5406(88)90162-x
- Arvystas MG. Nonextraction treatment of severe Class II, division 2 malocclusions: Part 2. Am J Orthod. 1991;99(1):74-84. DOI:
- 1016/S0889-5406(05)81683-X
- Poulton DR. The influence of extraoral traction. Am J orthod. 1967;53(1):8-18. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9416(67)90135-2
[Google Scholar] - Egolf RJ, BeGole EA, Upshaw HS. Factors associated with orthodontic patient compliance with intraoral elastic and headgear wear. Am J Orthod. 1990;97(4):336-48. DOI: 10.1016/0889-
[Google Scholar] 5406(90)70106-M - Blechman AM. Magnetic force systems in orthodontics: clinical results of a pilot study. Am J Orthod. 1985;87(3):201-10. DOI:
- 1016/0002-9416(85)90041-7
- Gianelly AA. Distalization of molars with repelling magnets. J Clin Orthod. 1988;22:40-4.
- Bondemark L, Kurol J. Distalization of maxillary first and second molars simultaneously with repelling magnets. Eur J Orthod.1992;14(4):264-72. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/14.4.264
[Google Scholar] - Bondemark L, Kurol J. Repelling magnets versus superelastic Ni-Ti coils in simultaneous distal movement of maxillary first and second molars, Angle Orthod. 1994;63:189-98. DOI: 10.1043/0003-
[Google Scholar] 3219(1994)064<0189:RMVSNC>2.0.CO;2 - Gianelly AA, Bednar J, Dietz VS. Japanese NiTi coils used to move molars distally. Am J Orthod. 1991;99(6):564-6. DOI:
- 1016/S0889-5406(05)81633-6
- Hilgers JJ. The pendulum appliance for Class II non-compliance therapy. J Clin Orthod. 1992;26:706-14.
- Erverdi N, Koyutürk Ö, Ni-Ti coil springs and repelling magnets, Br J Orthod. 1997; 24:147-53. DOI: 10.1093/ortho/24.1.47
[Google Scholar] - Hamilton CF, Saltaji H, Preston CB, Flores-Mir C, Tabbaa S. Adolescent patients' experience with the Carriere distalizer appliance. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2013;14(3):219-24.
- Miotti F. The passive lingual arch in first bicuspid extraction. Angle Orthod. 1984;54(2):163-75. DOI: 10.1043/0003
[Google Scholar] - 3219(1984)054<0163:TPLAIF>2.0.CO;2 566 Yadav et al / Journal of Contemporary Orthodontics 2025;9(4):560-566 - Andreasen G, Naessig C. Experimental findings on mesial relapse of maxillary first molars. Angle Orthod. 1968;38(1):51-5. DOI:
- 1043/0003-3219(1968)038<0051:EFOMRO>2.0.CO;2
- Gianelly AA. Distal movement of the maxillary molars. Am J Orthod. 1998;114(1):66-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0889-5406(98)70240-9
[Google Scholar] - Rajesh M, Kishore MS, Shetty KS. Comparison of anchorage loss following initial leveling and aligning using ROTH and MBT Prescription–A clinical prospective study. JIOH: 2014;6(2):16.
- Dent EJ. A study to evaluate the prevalence of golden proportion and RED proportion in aesthetically pleasing smiles. Eur J Prosthodont Rest Dent. 2013;21(1):29-33.
- Meshramkar R, Mathur P, Navya NB, Gupta M, Lekha K. A Study to Evaluate the Role of Macro-, Micro-, and Miniesthetics in an Attractive Smile. Int J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2019;9(4):117-23. DOI:10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1251
[Google Scholar]
How to Cite This Article
Vancouver
Yadav E, Kumar S, Kumar M, Garg C, Sharma A. Management of Class II division 2 patient treated with Carriere motion appliance [Internet]. J Contemp Orthod. 2025 [cited 2025 Oct 28];9(4):560-566. Available from: https://doi.org/doi:10.18231/j.jco.6442.1758974289
APA
Yadav, E., Kumar, S., Kumar, M., Garg, C., Sharma, A. (2025). Management of Class II division 2 patient treated with Carriere motion appliance. J Contemp Orthod, 9(4), 560-566. https://doi.org/doi:10.18231/j.jco.6442.1758974289
MLA
Yadav, Ekta, Kumar, Sumit, Kumar, Mukesh, Garg, Charu, Sharma, Aditi. "Management of Class II division 2 patient treated with Carriere motion appliance." J Contemp Orthod, vol. 9, no. 4, 2025, pp. 560-566. https://doi.org/doi:10.18231/j.jco.6442.1758974289
Chicago
Yadav, E., Kumar, S., Kumar, M., Garg, C., Sharma, A.. "Management of Class II division 2 patient treated with Carriere motion appliance." J Contemp Orthod 9, no. 4 (2025): 560-566. https://doi.org/doi:10.18231/j.jco.6442.1758974289